top of page
Search
  • Writer's pictureOld time preacher1

To: Bill C-4; NUTS! From: True Believing Christians.




"Whereas conversion therapy causes harm to society because, among other things, it is based on and propagates myths and stereotypes about sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression, including the Myth that heterosexuality, cisgender gender identity, and gender expression that conforms to the sex assigned to a person at birth are to be preferred over other sexual orientations, gender identities and gender expressions;

And whereas, in light of those harms, it is important to discourage and denounce the provision of conversion therapy in order to protect the human dignity and equality of all Canadians" [Bill C-4]



Nothing in the world would give me a greater calling than to be allowed to explain to both Justin Trudeau and Erin O'Toole, why biblically speaking, same-sex acts are still considered a sin by God in 2022.


(Numbers 23:19 "God is not human, that he should lie, not a human being, that he should change his mind. Does he speak and then not act? Does he promise and not fulfill?")


But!

Based on the passing of C-4, I know that neither Trudeau nor O'Toole would have the stomach or will to listen to a biblical case, for why God still considers same-sex relationships a sin.


I would have more luck preaching the gospel message, to the Evolutionist, Hypothetical Mudpuddle creature; than with God-hating Canadian politicians.


It is written in Scripture: Matthew 7:6


"Do not give dogs what is holy, and do not throw your pearls before pigs, lest they trample them underfoot and turn to attack you."

A Metaphor that Speaks to believers to not waste their time with people who are unable to or are unwilling to listen to the wisdom of God.


Thus this blog isn't about convincing anyone of the truth of male-female Relationships defined by God. The fact that male-female relationships are the only positive example of a fruitful Relationship is already self-evident in creation itself. If you wish to reject the positive Standard of male-female Relationships for that of a lie? Then that's a You issue, not a God issue, for God has spoken crystal clear on this topic.


Genesis 2:24

"Therefore, a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh."


So then, what's the purpose of this blog if I am not here to force convert anyone?


A 2 fold purpose.


The first purpose of this blog is to clarify to the Canadian government that we, Canadian Christians, will defy any law that calls Genesis 2:24 a "myth" and tries to Criminalize Scripture for Pointing out the obvious.

I say to Trudeau and O'Toole

"Build your Stalag 13 prison camps because we will NEVER! Stop preaching the truth of Genesis 2:24.

We will never stop calling out sin according to the standards of God.

And if you Don't like that? Well, that's a You issue. It's not God's issue.


God will not be Consulted by mankind on what he should affirm or not affirm. You don't get a vote; you don't get a voice at the table of God.


"As I live, declares the Lord God, I will not be inquired of by you. What is in your mind shall never happen." - Ezekiel 20:31

The Second purpose of this blog.


To Educate Canadian Christians on why they can tell Bill C-4 to go Nuts!...You Christian, have nothing to fear when battling Trudeau and O'Toole's C-4 bill.

It's your duty as a Christian to be dissident on this Useless law, both in public and in the courts.

(Matthew 12:30

"Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters.")


Bill C-4 is poorly composed and is loaded with prejudices towards Christianity.

What do I mean by prejudices? Let me show you one example of the biases that this bill is guilty of.


(1 Corinthians 1:20

"Where is the one who is wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world?")


Example.


"based on and propagates myths"

While many areas can be used to show the prejudices of this bill, I think the Quickest and easiest one to offer is the Above statement.


Why is the "propagates myth" Statement an Imperfect choice of term used in this bill?


Simple, if you're going to use a term that implies a clear consensus of something as being a myth? Then you better be sure that what you're assuming is a myth. Is, in fact, a Myth.


To withstand the cross-examination that will come your way, you better have all the facts and evidence on your worldview side.


C-4 gets an F- Grade because it assumes more than it could ever prove.


C-4 fails to make even the most basic and audible claims for why its Worldview is correct, and thus, why the Christian worldview is a "Myth".


C-4 Relies on Arbitrary, lazy woke Language/Definitions[?]/Terminologies,

To make its case. Which really is no case. Mere opinion and emptied words, created by Anti-Christian zealots.


"Propagates."?


Propagate Implies Propaganda.


Spread and promote an idea, theory, etc., widely.


This is what we Christians call "ironic."

Why? Because of the objective facts.


Christians don't Propagate the positive Standard of male-female relationships.

Nature takes care of this for us.

Since created Nature shows us a clear purpose for male and female relationships, than what is it? That we Christians are Propagating?


If God made them male and female (Which he did). Then, the reality of male-female relationships would be so Obviously Genuine, whether Christians exegete male-female purpose, wouldn't change the objective nature of male-female Relationships as being any less, or more factually accurate. It is true because God made it so, and it is simply true because he made it true.


"God said to Moses, "I am who I am." - Exodus 3:14

Nature would naturally reveal God's positive purpose through procreation without there needing to be Scripture, which was the case before Genesis was even written down.

God's truth wasn't dependent on man's ability to understand God's purpose.


Male-female relationships produced offspring even without a clear understanding of the purpose of life.

People had children long before God called Abraham to himself; even before God told Moses to write down Genesis; people still had children.

"Go forth and multiply"

Genesis 1:28 was already self-evident.

Thus a positive Truth for life is found in Male-Female relationships that need no propagating or propaganda from humans to make Male-female relationships a positive truth. It just is.


In contrast

If there is no clear beneficial outcome, then whoever is trying to promote a non-beneficial reality is, in fact, the one who is Propagating a myth through means of propaganda, and other means. This is precisely what C-4 Attempts to do.


The Facts are the Facts.

The government of Canada has spent a vast amount of resources on Both Propagate and propagandizing, a Positive outcome for same-sex relationships to be seen as an optimistic outcome Standard to its Citizens.

Even though there is no Self-Evident natural benefit to Non-procreation relationships in a constructive social environment; the Government not only chooses this non-procreation relationship, but is now actively attacking those who promote a normal, natural procreation relationship.


Thus, it's the government of Canada and not Christians, who are propagating myths for their own self-Interest desired outcome, and are now starting to use laws, to force people, groups and organizations to comply and believe, or else.


(1 Corinthians 14:33 "For God is not a God of confusion but of peace")


Christians can't be accused of Propagating a myth since created Nature Affirms male-female relationships with a clear biological purpose, that is, so self-evident that to deny it is to play the part of the fool.

"If you have been foolish by exalting yourself or if you've been scheming, put your hand over your mouth." - Proverbs 30:32

The changing of a positive outcome.


This positive standard outcome, in male-female relationships, has always troubled those who wish to get past a clear Created design and moral Standard that is Found in male-female relationships.


A solution in history was needed to get away from procreation, which Bill C-4 Now Leans on.


'From the mud puddle to the moral You.'


"Louis Venour, in The Advocate, 1984


"Evolution is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is utterly useless." [English translation from the French]

Bill C-4 Leans on past Non-Neutral history to achieve its unfavorable Christian position.

Pay attention, Christian, as things are about to get interesting.


Most of the Terminology used in C-4 comes from a worldview that has spent decades Challenging the Positive Life Outcome standards as being nothing more than arbitrary.


Let me explain briefly.


Dr. Richard Krafft-Ebing 1840 - 1902 was a professor of psychiatry who was one of the first to introduce what I call the "Non-positive outcome Theory."

Krafft-Ebing would Both affirm and yet, also reject procreation as the positive outcome standard, for an outcome Subjective standard that wasn't so purpose-focused.


Up to this time, the Standard of male-female Relationships was the primary Standard for a positive relationship in society. God's Standard of Male-female Positive relationships was so Obvious, that Societies Across history would Naturally use the Benchmark found in male-female relationships to measure the ethical morality of all relationships.


This changed after Neo-Darwinism evolution Theory was introduced in the 1800s.

Finally, God-haters saw a way around a Clear design order, which would allow them to embrace all sorts of theories to tickle their ears for an Alternative outcome desired.


"They will turn away from hearing the truth and will turn aside to myths." - 2 Timothy 4:4

Krafft-Ebing was a total convert to the Fairytale of Evolution, Which is why I Believe Krafft-Ebing would often find himself in frustrating contradictions, in his own theories. He would conduct his Scientific Research projects on a presupposed worldview that embraced the no purpose mud puddle Religion as Absolute truth, While also embracing concept of morality, and a natural stabled order to nature.


Krafft-Ebing Moreover, rejected the Creation account told by Christians and Jews as false (Myths).


A real myth for you. The Myth of neutrality. No one's neutral

Evolutionary philosophy has preached a gospel message of no purpose for life, from the outset of its Inception.

As a result, this Fairytale for adults has liberated people like Krafft-Ebing to pursue self-centered Personhood/Innate Research, for the meanings of life, without worrying about moral absolutes.


Krafft-Ebing would ultimately in part, Affirm life's purpose as simple as one's Innate gratification, as the best-desired outcome for the meaning of life.

In simpler evolutionary words, it's all about you and what you can get out of this pointless life.


"When you realize that life is meaningless, the world does not seem so cruel any more and you can cope with it." - Somerset maugham

One's procreation was in part rejected for gratification; the Metaphorical flood gates were open to Begin embracing or exploring all manners of sexual desires and acts.

Psychiatrists were no longer looking at Non-procreation sexual acts as immoral.


Instead, they were being studied from what I call the "Gratification Social harm perspective".

And even when sexual categories were deemed socially harmful, this was done not through a wrong moral understanding. But instead was simply being reclassified and understood as mental illness.


This Understanding is still practiced today.


C-4 is the desired outcome of people who reject Genesis 2:24 for the Evolution gratification outcome, purpose.


Gratification/innate outcomes purposes, are the driving force behind bills like C-4.

Since Bill C-4 uses terminology made explicitly by people who supported the Gratification outcome theory.

C-4 will be framed and then defended on this Pre-condition of assumed realities.


As a result of the myths that the government believes in, they will paint Christianity as a hate group because they see Christians trying to deny a person the right to social and sexual Innate gratification outcome purpose.


The Good news! C-4 will give you plenty of opportunities to Challenge it's Prejudice.

Some Tips on how to challenge this Prejudice, God-hating bill.


For those believers who, in the Unlikely event, ever find themselves being charged with such a poor Excuse of a bill, let me provide you with some quick tips on defending yourself.


1) Challenge the Terminology of the bill right away.

C-4 is not neutral, it comes with an openly hostile worldview to Christianity.

Its terminology is so biased that Forcing the Government Lawyers to explain each of its terms, would reveal the government's discrimination Against Christianity through the very language and jargon, the government lawyers would use.

Especially if the backdrop of your Defence is Genesis 2:24.


2) Religious/Political claim.

Force the government to admit that their bill is not impartial and comes with a government belief system believed by political Politicians, who hold to an ideological belief and Worldview, that is contrary to what Christian Believe in.


If you're going to make the religious claim as part of your defence? (Which you should) Then you're going to have to make the whole fight a faith fight.


This includes framing the government's own Beliefs as more religious than not.

This won't be hard to Achieve since the government cannot help itself by promoting non-Procreation Relationships on many of its own government platforms, including social media sites.

The government often engages in ceremonies of raising flags, Ceremonies; Parades and Common gatherings to show support and fellowship with Non-procreation converts.


You're going to have to make it clear to the courts that the government is run by people who have ideas and beliefs that are just as Personal as Christianity beliefs are.


Bill C-4 is clearly written by Believers of the no procreation religion to push a worldview onto Canada and Canadians with the aid of the courts.

Its own language, terminology, and history can all be used to demonstrate to the courts that the government has a Conversion belief of its own making.


3) Are Canadian Christians protected?


C-4 wants to Claim that its purpose is to protect the "Dignity" of All Canadians Against "Forced Conversion therapy"?


Instead, C-4 has become the vary means in which to force, Government conversion therapy on Christians.

It would seem to this Student of common sense, that the Canadian government has now violated its own bill Premises, as it tries to force its Kool-Aid Down the throats of Christians.


"it is important to discourage and denounce the provision of conversion therapy in order to protect the human dignity and equality of all Canadians" - Bill C-4

Is The Canadian government now considering Christians a none Protective group?

Just like the Ku Klux Klan is a none protected Group?


Has the Bible been outlawed in Canada as a hate book?

If not?

Then how Exactly is C-4 not violating the Religious rights of Canadian Christians who joyfully preach the gospel truth?


The question needs to be asked to Politicians and to the courts. For example, does "equality of all Canadians" Include Canadian Christians?


3) God Converts. Christians do not.

Finally,

It needs to be made perfectly clear to the public, Politicians, and courts that true biblical Christians do not convert anyone to Christianity.


If I could argue somebody into Christianity? Then someone else, could argue you out of it.


"They went out from us, but they did not belong to us; for if they had belonged to us, they would have remained with us. However, they went out so that it might be made clear that none of them belongs to us." - 1 John 2:19

If Christianity was left to man's will? Christianity would have ran out of Gas after the death of Christ.

Whether you like it or not? or wish to admit it or not? The historical facts are documented. And those facts prove Jesus' disciples, all Fled from Christ on the night of his arrest. Stay that of John. One disciple Stayed by the side of Christ.


No one was running towards Jesus after being arrested, and definitely not running to him when crucified on a cross.

If all Jesus did was die on a cross, Christianity would have died alongside him.


So, this means something happened in those early hours on the 3rd day after the death of Christ, that would forever change human history.


An Empty Tomb was discovered on that day, and whether you like this idea or not, doesn't change history.

Without history recording that empty tomb, you wouldn't have Christianity. But history does record an empty Tomb, and Ever since that day, the world has been dazed, stunned and bitterly angry over it.


Why, you may ask?


In true Christianity, Christians believe that Mans heart is so wicked, so put off by God that he doesn't want God in his life.

Nor would he be willing under his own will; to follow God if he had the choice. This is why it's written that God will put a new heart within them.


Ezekiel 36:26

"I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you; I will remove your heart of stone and give you a heart of flesh."


Without God doing so, no one would come to love, and then give up the world's love of nothing mythology, to follow Christ.


This is why true biblical Christians don't try to convert anyone to our ranks, since we can't.

The power to change comes from God, this is true even in sexuality.

The Apostle Paul writes the following:


1 Corinthians 6:11


"And some of you used to be like this. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God."


Paul does not say, "such Are some of you."

Christians can provide support, advice, and prayer, but that's all we can do.

The rest is up to God.

And regardless of what Justin Trudeau or Erin O'Toole passed in the Canadian Parliament system.

Christians will continue to provide biblical teachings, Biblical support and Biblical advice to anyone struggling with a particular sin.

This includes same-sex attracted sins. And if you don't like this idea?

Well, To reiterate This articles title Header:

To: Bill C-4; NUTS! From: True believing Christians.

Conclusion

In future writings, I will be explaining more in-depth how and why, Christians need to start responding to these types of topics.

There is So! Much More that Christians need to know that a simple article isn't Good enough. Therefore pay attention in the not-so-distant future as we will be Releasing more writings on this topic that covers this topic more in-depth.


The past ways Christians have been dealing with these topics needs to change. We can no longer do the over-the-top style battling on this critical topic. It's not working, and I think one look at society proves this to be true.


The gospel:

The call is to repent of sins, to turn from wickedness. Love your God with all your heart, mind, soul, and brothers and sisters. To believe in accordance with the scriptures, that Jesus was crucified for his called children, and that he was buried, and that he rose again on the third day in accordance with Scripture. And that all who believe in him will have eternal life. And for those who do not stand for Christ will have their part in the Internal separation from our holy and just God, in the place known as Hell.


0 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page